NCERT Solutions for Class 9th Science Chapter 13 Project work — The Journey Beyond

Book page 268 Updated on2026-09-08

Q1.
Consider two hypothetical Earth-sized planets that have an atmosphere. Assume that one planet is entirely covered by oceans and the other is entirely by land. Knowing that the Sun heats the equator more than the poles, how would the wind patterns on these planets compare with the wind systems we observe on Earth, with its combination of land and sea?
Answer

Both planets would still have the great equator-to-pole circulation, because that is caused by latitude and by the Earth's rotation. What they would lose is everything that depends on land and sea lying side by side — sea breezes, land breezes, and above all the monsoon.

All-ocean planetAll-land planetThe real Earth
Pressure belts and planetary windsPresent — smooth, unbroken belts right round the planetPresent — but far more violent, because land heats and cools fastPresent, but broken up by continents
Daily and seasonal temperature swingVery small — water has a huge heat capacity and stores heatVery large — land has a small heat capacity, so it heats and cools quicklyIntermediate; coasts mild, interiors extreme
Land and sea breezesNone — no coast existsNone — no sea existsPresent all along the coasts
MonsoonNoneNonePresent — driven by the land heating faster than the sea in summer
Water cycle and rainfallAbundant evaporation and rain everywhereAlmost no evaporation source — a desert planet, dry and dustyUneven; wet coasts, dry interiors
Ocean currentsStrong, uninterrupted — no continents to block or redirect themNone at allBent into gyres by rotation and blocked by continents
The reasoning:
  • What survives on both planets. Unequal heating between equator and poles still creates the equatorial low and the sub-tropical highs, and the planet's rotation still deflects the winds — to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern. So planetary winds exist on both.
  • What disappears. The chapter says local winds and the land–sea breeze arise from "uneven heating of land and water". Remove one of the two and the mechanism has nothing to work with. India's southwest monsoon is a giant seasonal sea breeze — so an all-ocean or an all-land planet has no monsoon at all.
  • Why the all-land planet is stormier. Land has a much smaller heat capacity than water. It heats fiercely by day and cools sharply at night, so pressure differences build faster and winds are stronger and gustier — with dust storms rather than rain storms, since there is little water to evaporate.
  • Why the all-ocean planet is calmer but wetter. Water resists temperature change, so pressure gradients build slowly and the winds are steadier. But evaporation is everywhere, so cloud and rainfall are abundant and the currents run unbroken around the globe.
Sample conclusion to write: "Latitude and rotation set up the planetary wind belts on any rotating, heated planet. The contrast between land and sea sets up the regional and local winds. Earth has both, which is why its wind systems are the most varied of the three."
Q2.
Choose any one meal you ate recently (it could be anything, for example, roti and dal, rice and sambar, idli and chutney, and so on). For each main item in the meal, find out and explain: (i) how the carbon in it originally came from carbon dioxide in the air through photosynthesis, and (ii) how the nitrogen in it likely came from the atmosphere into the soil (for example, by bacteria or through the Haber-Bosch process and fertilisers) and then into the plant. Further, list other human activities involved in producing or cooking this meal that add extra carbon dioxide or nitrogen to the environment.
Answer

Method: pick your meal, list its main items, and for each one trace two paths — the carbon path (air → leaf → your plate) and the nitrogen path (air → soil → root → protein → your plate). Then list the fuel burnt and the fertiliser used along the way.

Sample answer — a meal of roti and dal

Item(i) Where its carbon came from(ii) Where its nitrogen came from
Roti (wheat)Wheat leaves took CO2 from the air through their stomata and, using sunlight and water, made glucose by photosynthesis. The glucose was stored as starch in the grain. Grinding it made the flour; the carbon in every chapati is atmospheric carbon.Wheat is not a legume, so the farmer applies urea. That urea was made from atmospheric N2 by the Haber–Bosch process. In the soil it becomes ammonia, nitrifying bacteria turn it into nitrate, and the wheat root assimilates the nitrate into the gluten proteins of the grain.
Dal (arhar / moong — a pulse)Same photosynthetic route — CO2 from the air became the carbohydrate of the seed.A pulse is a legume. Rhizobium living in nodules on its roots fixes N2 straight from the air into ammonia, which the plant uses to make the protein that makes dal a protein food. Little or no fertiliser is needed.
Cooking oil / gheeCarbon fixed by mustard or groundnut plants (or by the grass a cow ate) and stored as fat.Fat contains almost no nitrogen; the crop's nitrogen came from soil nitrate as above.
Salt and spicesSalt is mineral, not biological — no carbon path. Spices follow the plant route.

Human activities in this meal that add CO2 or nitrogen to the environment:

  • Making the fertiliser. The Haber–Bosch process is "energy intensive (uses ~ 1 – 2% of global energy)" and that energy is mostly fossil fuel — so urea carries a CO2 cost before it reaches the field.
  • Ploughing, sowing and harvesting. Diesel tractors and threshers burn fossil fuel.
  • Irrigation. Electric or diesel pumps, and much of India's electricity still comes from fossil fuels.
  • Fertiliser run-off. Excess nitrate washes into rivers and lakes and causes eutrophication; some soil nitrogen escapes as nitrogen oxides.
  • Transport and milling. Trucks to the mandi, the mill and the shop; the flour mill's motor.
  • Cooking. LPG or firewood — both release CO2. A pressure cooker cuts the fuel used, and so cuts the emission.
  • Packaging and waste. Plastic packets are made from petroleum; food waste rotting in a landfill releases methane.
The insight worth writing at the end: "the carbon in my roti was in the air a few months ago; the carbon released to cook it was in the ground for millions of years." The first is the fast cycle balancing itself; the second is a one-way addition. That difference is the whole climate problem in one sentence.
Q3.
ndia Meteorological Department (IMD, or newspaper records, find the average ptember, or the local season) for your city or district for 5 years during two decades, such as the 1980s and 2020s. Note any trend you may find (increasing or decreasing, or the total number of days) with heavy rain (>50 mm). How can this be connected to the warmer Arabian Sea temperatures or changes in land use (forests to farms to cities) as discussed in the chapter?
Answer
Note on the printed page: the first three lines of this bullet are cut off in the English edition (page 268) — the sentence begins in the middle of a word. The same project is printed complete in the Hindi edition Anveshan (page 268), and the full question reads: "Using data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD, https://mausam.imd.gov.in/) or newspaper records, find the average monsoon rainfall (June – September, or the local season) for your city or district for 5 years during two decades, such as the 1980s and 2020s. Note any trend you may find (increasing or decreasing, or the total number of days) with heavy rain (>50 mm). How can this be connected to the warmer Arabian Sea temperatures or changes in land use (forests to farms to cities) as discussed in the chapter?"

Method — how to do this project properly:

  1. Fix your station. Choose the IMD station nearest your city or district, so that you compare like with like.
  2. Fix your season. For most of India take June – September. For Tamil Nadu use the northeast monsoon, October – December.
  3. Collect two blocks of five years, for example 1981 – 1985 and 2019 – 2023, from https://mausam.imd.gov.in/ or from old newspaper reports in a library.
  4. Record two different things. (a) The total seasonal rainfall in mm. (b) The number of days on which rainfall exceeded 50 mm. These can move in opposite directions, and that is the whole point.
  5. Average each block and set them side by side.
Quantity1981 – 1985 average2019 – 2023 averageChange
Total monsoon rainfall (mm)(fill in)(fill in)(+ / – …%)
Number of days with > 50 mm rain(fill in)(fill in)(+ / – … days)
Number of dry days in the season(fill in)(fill in)(+ / – … days)
How to connect what you find to the chapter:
  • If heavy-rain days have increased even though the seasonal total has not changed much, that is exactly the pattern the chapter predicts: a warmer Arabian Sea gives "more evaporation from the sea", warm air holds more moisture, and the same water arrives in fewer, fiercer bursts. Fewer rainy days, heavier each.
  • If flooding in your city has worsened faster than rainfall has, look at land use. Forests and fields let rain infiltrate; concrete and asphalt do not. "Sudden bursts of intense rainfall result in more run off … and less infiltration reduces the recharge of groundwater."
  • If your city is hotter as well, add the urban heat island effect — cities warmed by concrete and asphalt can strengthen the rising air that triggers local downpours.
  • Be honest about the limits. Five years is a short sample and weather is naturally variable. Say clearly that your result is a suggestion of a trend, not proof. A scientist states the uncertainty; that is part of the answer.
Presentation tip: plot the two blocks as a bar chart — years on the x-axis, rainfall in mm on the y-axis — and mark the >50 mm days with a second colour. A trend that is hard to see in a table often jumps out of a graph.
Was this helpful? Report an error