Q1.
Why is it important that the ultimate source of power rests with the people in a democracy?
Answer
Because it settles the one question every political system has to answer: where does the government's authority come from, and who can take it back? If power comes from the people, then those who hold office hold it on trust and for a fixed term, not as property.
Three consequences follow directly, and each is in the chapter:
- The government can be replaced without violence. “A government elected through free and fair elections formulates policies and implements laws.” Because the same electorate can also refuse to re-elect it, disagreement is settled at the ballot box. The chapter's own proof is the general election of 1977: after the Emergency, “general elections were held, allowing people to express their will through the ballot”, and the defeat of the ruling government showed the system working.
- No one is born to rule. Popular sovereignty means the State “derives its authority from the people”, so authority is not inherited, seized or claimed by rank. This is the same idea the chapter finds in early India, where “the king was not an independent ruler but rather worked in consultation with assemblies, ministers, and officers”.
- Every adult counts equally. The right to vote belongs to “every citizen, 18 years of age and above” — Universal Adult Franchise, exercised through a secret ballot so that the vote is the voter's own and cannot be checked or punished afterwards.
Why it matters that the source is ultimate: governments must act on many days when no election is being held. The word ultimate means that in between elections the government still exercises borrowed power — which is why it must answer questions in Parliament, submit its accounts for audit, disclose information under the RTI Act, and defend its actions in court. Remove popular sovereignty and every one of those obligations loses its justification.