EN हिं

NCERT Solutions for Class 9th Social Science Chapter 6 The chapter's recap points, explained with the evidence behind each — Before we move on…

Book page 157–158 Updated on2026-09-08

Q1.
Democracy is a system of self-governance that involves institutions, rules, and practices enabling people to participate in decision-making at the local, state, and national levels; it is not limited to elections alone.
Answer

Take the three words the point rests on — institutions, rules, practices — and give the chapter's example of each at all three levels.

 InstitutionsRulesPractices
LocalGram Panchayat and Gram Sabha; Municipalities; Autonomous District Councils in specific north-eastern regionsThe PESA Act, 1996 makes the Gram Sabha the primary decision-making body in Scheduled Areas; Articles 243(d) and 243(t) reserve seats for womenJethipura's Special Gram Sabhas and Mahila Sabhas, maintained records and adequate quorum; South Manubankul's self-help groups
StateState Legislative Assemblies; State High CourtsState Panchayati Raj Acts — 21 States and 2 UTs at 50% reservation for women in PanchayatsLaws made by State Legislative Assemblies are checked by the judiciary for consistency with the Constitution
NationalParliament; the Election Commission of India; the courts; the CAG, CIC, Lokpal and CVCThe Constitution; the Representation of the People Act, 1951; the RTI Act, 2005Question Hour, auditing of government accounts, public debate, Public Interest Litigation
Why the last clause is the important one: “it is not limited to elections alone” is the chapter's central claim, and Fig. 6.5's Team D is its proof. Team D holds elections every year — and is still not democratic, because only selected candidates may contest, the President holds most of the power, the Council has very limited authority, and opposition voices are weak or discouraged. Elections are necessary but not sufficient; the institutions, rules and practices are what make the election mean something.
Q2.
Democratic processes are guided by principles, such as transparency, participation, inclusion, fairness, equality, accountability, and respect for diverse opinions.
Answer

Each of these seven principles is attached, in the chapter's own table on page 144, to a real process and a real institution. That is what saves them from being slogans.

ProcessInstitutionsDemocratic values
Legislative ProcessLegislature (Parliament, State legislature, and Local bodies)Representation, Deliberation, Dissent
Electoral ProcessElection Commission of IndiaParticipation, Equality
Judicial ProcessCourtsRule of law, Equality, Justice
Participatory ProcessesMedia, Civil SocietyDebate and discussion, freedom of expression
Accountability MechanismsComptroller and Auditor General (CAG), Central Information Commission (CIC), Lokpal, Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)Transparency
DecentralisationRural and Urban local bodiesPeople's participation at grassroots level
FederalismDivision of powers between the centre and the states is guaranteed through a written constitutionDevolution of power

Reading the table the other way round is more instructive: transparency is not a mood, it is the CAG, the CIC, the Lokpal, the CVC and the RTI Act; participation is the Election Commission and the local bodies; respect for diverse opinions is dissent on the legislature's row and freedom of expression on the media's; inclusion and fairness are Article 46, the reservation of seats for women, and polling stations built for a single voter.

Tip: the chapter introduces this table with a warning worth quoting in an answer — “The real strength of democracy lies in its citizens — their participation, awareness of duties and rights, and commitment to honesty and fairness. Without these, no democratic process or institution can function effectively or deliver meaningful outcomes.”
Q3.
Democratic ideas in India have deep roots in ancient traditions, such as the Sabhā and Samiti mentioned in Vedic texts, which emphasised consultation and collective decision-making. Such ideas and values, along with later developments from around the world, shaped the modern democratic system.
Answer

The point has two halves, and the answer needs both: indigenous roots, and later global influence.

The indigenous roots the chapter names:

  • Sabha, Samiti and Vidhata — assemblies of the Vedic period “that involved collective decision-making”.
  • The early republican states, the gaṇas or saṁghas.
  • The rule that “the king was not an independent ruler but rather worked in consultation with assemblies, ministers, and officers of various capacities.”
  • The Aikyamatya Sūktam verse of the Ṛigveda (10.191.3), Fig. 6.1 — “Their counsel is one and the same; their assembly is one. Their mind is one, and their intention together is one.” The chapter reads it as evidence that consultation, consensus and shared responsibility have deep roots in India's intellectual and cultural traditions.
  • The Bauddha Saṁgha — the monastic community established by Gautama Buddha, which “encouraged debate and discussion, and its members could choose their leader and make decisions through voting”. This is the clearest early example, because it names a procedure, not only a value.

The later developments: “Apart from the indigenous democratic traditions, the global spread of democratic values also influenced the Constituent Assembly's Debates (CAD), contributing to the creation of a robust, flexible, transformative, and responsive constitution.” The chapter also notes that women in Britain got full voting rights only in 1928 and in the United States of America in 1920 — so India, adopting Universal Adult Franchise for all citizens in 1950, was drawing on a worldwide argument that had itself only recently been settled elsewhere.

Why the chapter insists on both halves: if democracy in India were purely borrowed, it would be a foreign transplant with shallow roots; if it were purely ancient, the Constitution's genuinely new features — Universal Adult Franchise from the first day, enforceable Fundamental Rights, an independent judiciary with the power of review — would be unexplained. The chapter's position is that the modern system was built out of both, which is exactly why it says the democratic ethos “did not emerge suddenly; rather, it evolved through a long historical process.”
Q4.
India’s democracy is based on its Constitution, which provides for popular sovereignty, universal adult franchise, fundamental rights and duties, the rule of law, and the separation of powers.
Answer

Match each item to the constitutional provision the chapter names for it — that is what turns the sentence into an answer.

What the Constitution providesThe provision or mechanismWhat it prevents
Popular sovereigntyGovernment formed through free and fair elections; the State derives its authority from the peopleAuthority claimed by inheritance, force or rank
Universal adult franchiseThe vote for every citizen 18 and above, by secret ballot; extended to men and women alike when the Constitution came into force in 1950Voting restricted by property, education, sex or community
Fundamental rightsSix rights, Articles 14–32; enforceable in courts; remedies under Articles 32 and 226; Article 21A added in 2009A majority government legislating away an individual's freedom or dignity
Fundamental dutiesObligations of the citizen — the chapter's list of civic responsibility, and Fig. 6.9's “Follow fundamental duties”Citizens who claim protection but damage public property or spread misinformation
Rule of lawEquality before the law, equal protection of the law; Article 21 — procedure established by lawPunishment without procedure; the powerful placing themselves above the law
Separation of powersLegislature makes, executive implements, judiciary interprets; judicial review of amendments and of lawsConcentration of power in one organ

Two provisions in the chapter hold the rest together. Article 368 lets the Constitution be amended lawfully, so it can respond to changing socio-political needs “without compromising its fundamental values” — Article 21A in 2009 is the chapter's own example. Article 46 commits the State to the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections, because formal equality alone would leave historically unequal opportunities untouched.

Did you know? The Constituent Assembly took 2 years, 11 months and 18 days to draft this document — the world's longest written Constitution — and it was adopted on 26 November 1949 and came into force on 26 January 1950.
Q5.
India is considered the world’s largest democracy due to the scale of citizen participation, particularly the number of registered voters, although challenges remain in ensuring deeper inclusion and representation.
Answer

The claim and the qualification are both in the sentence, so answer both.

The claim, in the chapter's figures: a population of over 140 crore; over 96.8 crore registered voters in 2024; on average about 25 lakh people per Member of Parliament (2019); elections in 22 scheduled languages with election symbols so that citizens who cannot read can vote independently; more than one million polling stations, including in mountains, forests, deserts and islands, and “in some cases, polling stations are created even for a single voter”; and over 2,800 registered political parties. The chapter's own reading: India's democracy “stands out for its scale, depth, and inclusiveness”, and what makes it “living” is “its diversity and citizens' active engagement in the electoral process”.

The qualification, in the chapter's own words: India is the largest democracy “not merely in terms of numbers, but through the sustained involvement of its people” — and it still faces illiteracy, misinformation, inequality, poverty, regionalism, gender inequality and social discrimination, all of which “create barriers to equal participation”, plus “gaps in the effective implementation of laws and policies”. The clearest single example the chapter gives of the gap between a right and its exercise is women's representation: the vote came in 1950 without a struggle, but “the right to vote does not automatically ensure equal participation. Social prejudices continue to act as barriers and affect women's adequate representation in politics.”

Why 'largest' and 'deepest' are different measurements: size counts how many people are entitled to take part; inclusion counts whether they actually can, and whether their concerns reach the people who decide. The chapter keeps both in view — it is proud of the scale and honest about the gap, which is why it ends this recap point with “although challenges remain”.
Q6.
Democracies across the world follow different systems but share common democratic values and principles.
Answer

The differences are in structure; the shared part is in the values. The page 148 table shows both at once.

Where they differ:

  • Where the executive sits. Inside the legislature and answerable to it (India, Canada, United Kingdom); independent of it and directly elected (United States of America); or a council rather than a single leader (Switzerland — “Executive Power lies with the Federal Council”).
  • Who the Head of State is. An elected President (India), a Monarch (United Kingdom), a Governor-General appointed by the Monarch on the Prime Minister's advice (Canada), or the same person as the Head of Government (Switzerland, United States of America).
  • Whether the constitution is written. India, Switzerland, Canada and the United States of America have written constitutions; the United Kingdom has an unwritten constitution with parliamentary sovereignty.
  • How many parties matter. India is a multi-party democracy with over 2,800 registered parties; the United States of America is listed as having two major parties.
  • How much citizens decide directly. Switzerland is the chapter's direct democracy; India and the others are representative.

What they share — the fundamental principles the chapter lists before the table: freedom, equality, participation, rule of law, rights and duties. To these the country table adds features that recur across the entries: federalism (India, Canada), multi-party competition (India, Canada, United Kingdom, Switzerland), and government by consent expressed through periodic elections.

Why no single model exists: the chapter's explanation is that “Different societies institutionalise democracy in diverse ways, depending on how citizens participate in decision-making and how political power is structured.” A country's history, size and diversity decide the machinery. Switzerland can put major questions to all citizens; India, with over 96.8 crore voters, cannot, and so chose representation — which is exactly the trade-off Fig. 6.5's Team A and Team B are asking you to think about.
Q7.
Citizens contribute to democracy through civic awareness, responsible use of media, participation in community activities, and respect for democratic values in everyday life.
Answer

This is the chapter's closing argument, and it is a factual claim about how institutions actually run, not a piece of advice. “Ultimately, the strength of a democracy depends not only on its institutions and laws but also on informed and responsible citizens who actively participate in shaping their society.”

What citizens doWhat the chapter says about itWhat fails without it
Civic awareness“Being well-informed is one of the vital responsibilities of a young citizen” — reading newspapers, watching news programmes, using the internet responsiblyVoting and public debate continue, but on unreliable information
Responsible use of mediaMedia literacy (Fig. 6.9); the challenge of “fake news, especially through social media and other digital platforms”Misinformation “can influence public opinion, create confusion, and sometimes even lead to conflict”
Participation in community activitiesLocal councils, public consultations and community-driven initiatives; NSS, NCC, Bharat Scouts & Guides; Gram Sabhas and Mahila SabhasInstitutions exist but stand empty — “indifference towards public issues can adversely affect the health of a democracy”
Respect for democratic values in everyday lifeAbiding by laws and rules, respecting others' rights, appreciating diversity, participating in activities that strengthen unity“Actions, such as damaging public property, spreading misinformation, or violating public rules weaken democratic values”
Why the citizen is the last line, not the first: every safeguard in this chapter is operated by people. Question Hour works only if members ask real questions; the RTI Act works only if citizens file applications and read the replies; a Gram Sabha works only if enough villagers turn up to make the quorum; and free expression protects a democracy only if what is expressed has been checked. The rules can require attendance; they cannot supply attention. That is the gap only citizens can fill.
Was this helpful? Report an error